Sunday, February 27, 2022

Sustainable Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities for National Development

  


Abstract

Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) are bona fide citizens in every country and as such have equal rights to development opportunities provided for other citizens of the nation. It is observed that a number of persons with disabilities  have become a burden to the society, rather than contributing members of their communities and nation at large. This is because they have been neglected by society and the government has failed in its responsibility to properly empower and invest in them for national development. In addition, PWDs in some countries are negatively regarded as environmental nuisance and wastage in the society as many of them are involved in begging all because of lack of sustainable rehabilitation. In spite of the numerous challenges posed by the handicapping conditions, persons with disabilities are blessed with a wide range of skills and talents which are needed for utilization and national development. If persons with disabilities are to be transformed into productive and independent, rather than remain a burden to the society, by extension, development of the nation, then there is need to invest in and empower them. This is where the issue of sustainable rehabilitation comes in. Therefore, this article discusses the concept persons with disabilities, concept of rehabilitation, typologies of rehabilitation which entails medical, psycho-social, educational and vocational rehabilitation. The article also ends with a conclusion and recommendations.


Keyword: Sustainable, Rehabilitation, Programmes, National Development,  Persons with Disabilities.


1.  Introduction

It was widely reported that Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) are excluded from education, health, employment and other aspects of society and this can potentially lead to or exacerbate handicapping conditions (WHO, 2011). The United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities states that “comprehensive rehabilitation services including health, employment, education and social services are needed ‘to enable persons with disabilities to attain and maintain maximum independence, full physical, mental, social and vocational ability, and full inclusion and participation in all aspects of life” (UN, 2008).


Therefore, Rehabilitation is a programme geared towards enabling PWDs to overcome their challenges and move from dependency to independent status in the society. Rehabilitation is a programme planned for adults and children with disabilities to teach and train them to live a normal and productive life after they experience damage, defect or malformation of one more part of their bodies and aims to restore the individual to normal functioning. It is a process that occurs in specially designed procedures for PWDs to receive full restoration to overcome any handicapping conditions. This is done by teaching and training them to use their potentials and abilities optimally to function physically, mentally, socially, psycho-analytically, economically, etc. to achieve self-actualization. Therefore, rehabilitation services include everything done to help a person with disability to perform well enough to achieve independence. Likewise, a sustainable rehabilitation programme is a durable, workable and tenable programme geared towards removing or reducing the handicapping conditions which enables PWDs to overcome their challenges and move from dependency to independence, and become productive for national development (Jackson, 2009).


2.  Theoretical Underpinning

This article is guided by a Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) model as a new strategy used to provide rehabilitation services to persons with disabilities within and by their community and not in a separate institution.


2.1  Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) Model

Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is the strategy endorsed by WHO for general community development for the rehabilitation, poverty reduction, equalization of opportunities, and social inclusion of all Persons with Disabilities (PWD). CBR is implemented through the combined efforts of PWDs themselves, their families and communities, and the relevant governmental and non-governmental health, educational, vocational, social and other services. CBR is delivered within the community using predominantly local resources. The objective of the CBR strategy is to improve the quality of life for individuals with disabilities and their families, by doing their daily tasks independently, and by participating effectively in their community. CBR was created to empower people with disabilities to benefit from education, working positions, health, community, and social services. CBR relies on the cooperation between people with disabilities themselves to be implemented effectively. Also, their families, local communities, governmental administrations, non-governmental organizations, associations and other relevant services should take part in the implementation process (Davis, 2006).


           

                    Source:  WHO (1980)


The CBR Matrix provides a basic framework for CBR programs. It highlights the need to target rehabilitation at different aspects of life including the five key components: health, education, livelihood, social, and empowerment. Thus, a CBR program is not expected to implement every component of the CBR matrix, and not all PWDs require assistance in each component of the matrix. However, a CBR program should be developed in partnership with PWDs to best meet local needs, priorities and resources. A health condition may lead to an impairment, which could restrict full participation in aspects of society, thus resulting in disability. Providing CBR may reduce some of the consequences of the impairment, by facilitating participation by PWDs in the domains of health, education, livelihood, social activities, and empowerment. CBR could therefore range from providing assistive devices in the community to increase mobility, to coordinating with local schools to ensure inclusion of children with disability, offering vocational rehabilitation to increase wage employment, family counseling to improve relationships, and the establishment of self-help groups to improve political participation. The outcomes of CBR will therefore vary depending on the targets of specific programs, but could include improving social participation, clinical outcome and quality of life among Persons with Disabilities (Davis, 2006).


3. Methodology

Secondary data were used for the writing of this paper. Secondary data has to do with documentary sources of data which include  documents either hand written or typed, electronic or print, softcopy or hardcopy, published or unpublished. Therefore, books and published journal articles of various scholars, national and international documents were examined, reviewed and used in writing this paper, and they were  duly acknowledged in an in-text citation and in a references list.


4.  Conceptual Clarification

4.1  Concept of Persons with Disabilities

Disability is an umbrella term for impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, denoting the negative aspects of the interaction between an individual (with a health condition) and that individual’s contextual factors (environmental and personal factors) (WHO, 2011). Persons with disabilities (PWDs) therefore include those who have long-term physical, mental, psycho-social, intellectual or sensory impairments resulting from any physical or mental health conditions which in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others (UN, 2008). Persons with disabilities categories into the following:

  1. Physical impairment is often the most easily identifiable and presents difficulty in the performance of bodily functions involving: movement and mobility (such as walking, climbing stairs, standing, or maintaining or changing position); body movements (such as reaching, crouching or kneeling); and using upper limbs (including gripping or using fingers to grasp or handle objects). Persons with physical impairments may use assistive devices including walking sticks, crutches or wheelchairs.

  2. Sensory impairment includes vision, hearing and communication impairments. 

  • Vision impairment includes persons who are blind and also people with low vision.

  • Hearing impairment includes Deaf persons, as well as people with hearing loss with some residual hearing. Depending on their situation, persons with hearing impairment may communicate through spoken language or use sign language and/or lip-reading to communicate.

  • Communication impairment includes persons with difficulty in speaking or with speech impairments who may require adapted communication techniques.

  1. Intellectual disability includes persons with limited ability to understand new or complex information and to learn and apply new skills. This may impact three domains that determine how well an individual copes with everyday tasks: (1) the conceptual domain – skills in language, reading, writing, math, reasoning, knowledge and memory; (2) the social domain – empathy, social judgment, interpersonal communication skills, the ability to make and retain friendships, and similar capacities; and (3) the practical domain – self-management in areas such as personal care, job responsibilities, money management, recreation and organizing tasks.

  2. Mental and psycho-social disability includes persons with impairments related to mental health conditions, including chronic severe mental disorders or psychosocial distress. These people may experience difficulties in relating to others; distressed moods or confused thoughts; an inability to take care of themselves; and difficulties related to behaviour, language and intellectual activities. These difficulties in turn may impact their social skills and participation.


4.2  Concept of Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation has long lacked a unifying conceptual framework. Historically, the term has described a range of responses to disability, from interventions to improve body function to more comprehensive measures designed to promote inclusion. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health provides a framework that can be used for all aspects of rehabilitation. For some people with disabilities, rehabilitation is essential to being able to participate in education, the labour market, and civic life. Rehabilitation is always voluntary, and some individuals may require support with decision-making about rehabilitation choices. In all cases rehabilitation should help to empower a person with a disability and his or her family. Article 26, Habilitation and Rehabilitation, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities calls for: appropriate measures, including through peer support, to enable persons with disabilities to attain and maintain their maximum independence, full physical, mental, social and vocational ability, and full inclusion and participation in all aspects of life”. The Article further calls on countries to organize, strengthen, and extend comprehensive rehabilitation services and programmes, which should begin as early as possible, based on multidisciplinary assessment of individual needs and strengths, and including the provision of assistive devices and technologies (Walker, 2005).

 

A modern healthcare system must do more than just stop people dying. It needs to equip them to live their lives, fulfill their maximum potential and optimise their contribution to family life, their community and society as a whole. Rehabilitation achieves this by focusing on the impact that the health condition, developmental difficulty or disability has on the person’s life, rather than focusing just on their diagnosis. It involves working in partnership with the person and those important to them so that they can maximise their potential and independence and have choice and control over their own lives. It is a philosophy of care that helps to ensure people are included in their communities, employment and education rather than being isolated from the mainstream and pushed through a system with ever-dwindling hopes of leading a fulfilling life. It is increasingly acknowledged that effective rehabilitation delivers better outcomes and improved quality of life and has the potential to reduce health inequalities and make significant cost savings across the health and care system (Stilwell, 2010).


Rehabilitation covers an enormous spectrum within our patients’ pathways. It includes support to learn basic communication skills; exercise classes to improve or maintain optimum health, wellbeing and occupation; and complex neurological rehabilitation following major trauma or stroke. Rehabilitation may be appropriate at any age as a person’s needs change through the course of their life. For example, they may require support to:

  1. develop skills for the first time;

  2. recover from unexpected illness;

  3. manage long-term conditions;

  4. self-manage conditions;

  5. recover from major trauma;

  6. maintain skills and independence;

  7. access advocacy (Thomas, 2002).


Rehabilitation is “a set of measures that assist individuals who experience, or are likely to experience, disability [resulting from impairment, regardless of when it occurred (congenital, early or late)] to achieve and maintain optimal functioning in interaction with their environments”. This definition corresponds to the comprehensive process that contributes to health promotion and determines most Handicap International projects. It is therefore necessary to refine this definition to fit the activities developed as part of Rehabilitation Services Unit-supported projects. The WHO defines the individual in his environment as the centre of the rehabilitation process. “Individuals” should be understood to be not just those “who experience, or are likely to experience, disability,” but also their families, who can be helped to become actors in the rehabilitation process and benefit from the results achieved (Davis, 2006).

 

WHO (2011), defines rehabilitation as “a set of measures that assist individuals who experience, or are likely to experience, disability to achieve and maintain optimal functioning in interaction with their environments”. A distinction is sometimes made between habilitation, which aims to help those who acquire disabilities congenitally or early in life to develop maximal functioning; and rehabilitation, where those who have experienced a loss in function are assisted to regain maximal functioning. In this paper the term “rehabilitation” covers both types of intervention. Although the concept of rehabilitation is broad, not everything to do with disability can be included in the term. Rehabilitation targets improvements in individual functioning – say, by improving a person’s ability to eat and drink independently. Rehabilitation also includes making changes to the individual’s environment – for example, by installing a toilet handrail.


Rehabilitation involves the identification of a person’s problems and needs, relating the problems to relevant factors of the person and the environment, defining rehabilitation goals, planning and implementing the measures, and assessing the effects. Educating people with disabilities is essential for developing knowledge and skills for self-help, care, management, and decision-making. People with disabilities and their families experience better health and functioning when they are partners in rehabilitation (WHO, 2011).


4.3 Sustainable Rehabilitation

Sustainable rehabilitation is  conceptualized as a continuous programme of activities that involve accurate evaluation, appropriate education/training based on need and ends with full employment and monitoring for persons who face numerous challenges due to any form of disability. Sustainable rehabilitation ensures that nothing is left out in the efforts to enable a person with disability overcome the Psychological impact of disability rise from state of dependency to independence and become a self-confident, self-reliant and contributing members of the society to which he/she belongs (Aiyeleso, Onajo & Kadala, 2020).


5. Typologies of Rehabilitation Services

5.1 Medical Rehabilitation

Medical rehabilitation is concerned with improving functioning through the diagnosis and treatment of health conditions, reducing impairments, and preventing or treating complications. Doctors with specific expertise in medical rehabilitation are referred to as physiatrists, rehabilitation doctors, or physical and rehabilitation specialists. Medical specialists such as psychiatrists, paediatricians, geriatricians, ophthalmologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopaedic surgeons can be involved in medical rehabilitation, as can a broad range of therapists. In many parts of the world where specialists in medical rehabilitation are not available, services may be provided by doctors and therapists. Rehabilitation medicine has shown posi￾tive outcomes, for example, in improving joint and limb function, pain management, wound healing, and psychosocial well-being (WHO, 2011).


a- Therapy

Therapy is concerned with restoring and compensating for the loss of functioning, and preventing or slowing deterioration in functioning in every area of a person’s life. Therapists and rehabilitation workers include occupational therapists, orthotists, physiotherapists, prosthetists, psychologists, rehabilitation and technical assistants, social workers, and speech and language therapists. Therapy measures include:

  1. training, exercises, and compensatory strategies;

  2. education;

  3. support and Counseling;

  4. modifications to the environment;

  5. provision of resources and assistive technology (WHO, 2011).


b- Audiological Service

Audiology is concerned with restoring and compensating for the loss of hearing, and preventing or slowing deterioration of  hearing loss in person. Audiologists are medical specialists who are concerned with normal and abnormal aspects of hearing diagnosis and rehabilitation of the deaf and hard of hearing. This service helps to determine the range, nature and degree of that hearing loss as well as provide hearing aids, language auditory and speech reading training (Ferrans, 2008).


c- Ophthalmological Service

Ophthalmology is concerned with restoring and compensating for the loss of eye functioning, and preventing or slowing deterioration of eye-sight loss in person. The opthalmologist are medical specialists responsible for the health of the eyes. They consider the physiology of the eyes, its organic aspects, diseases and structure. They provide rehabilitation services in form of medicine or supportive aids like eye-glasses for persons with visual impairments (Ferrans, 2008).


c- Neurological Services

Neurology deals with brain injuries, brain tumors and stroke cases. The neurologists are medical specialists who evaluate the development and functioning of the central nervous system. They provide rehabilitation services to persons with spinal cord injuries (Ferrans, 2008).


The above-mentioned medical services are provided by physicians respectively who are either brought into the rehabilitation team or attend to the client in a hospital. In well organized rehabilitation programme, the cost of medical rehabilitation service is borne by the public through Medicare, healthcare insurance schemes among others. Early identification of and prevention of impairments in children may be organized as part of medical habilitation before such disorders get out of hand to constitute handicaps to life and employmen (Ferrans, 2005).


5.2 Psyco-Social Rehabilitation (PSR)

These are rehabilitation services that involve restoring the social functioning and the dignity of persons with disability, inter-personal relationship training, building self-esteem and self-concept. PSR is a treatment approach designed to help improve the lives of people with disabilities. The goal of psychosocial rehabilitation is to teach emotional, cognitive, and social skills that help those diagnosed with mental illness live and work in their communities as independently as possible (Okeke, 2001).


In addition, psycho-social rehabilitation addresses behavioral and mental health issues faced by individuals across the lifespan who are affected by any injury or chronic condition that leads to disability, including issues such as emotional coping, counseling for adjustment to disability and behavior that promotes positive adaptation to disability. Also, the parents, caregivers or family members of PWDs are served through psycho-social rehabilitation by Psychologists to adjust to a disabling status of their children with disabilities. That is, rehabilitation psychologists offer services to family members/caregivers with specific information about the particular disability, along with skills for coping with their family member’s disabling condition (Hale & Cowls, 2009). 


5.3 Educational Rehabilitation

Educational rehabilitation programmes in this context will refer to acquisition of pre-requisite body of knowledge and skills for independent living. It is a  mere acquisition of basic literacy and skills as well as educative training in some prescribed areas of learning which enables persons with disabilities to participate in their society and contribute their quota for national development. Educational rehabilitation programmes for PWDs start from elementary schools to tertiary institutions. The educational rehabilitation programme is designed towards attainment or meeting the unique needs of persons with disabilities in terms of education. Such programme is meant to address their unique needs for proper placement and the attainment of ultimate goal of being independent members that can contribute to societal development in all segments of life endeavor (Tuggar, 2016).


Furthermore, educational rehabilitation entails a range of services including social work services and rehabilitative counseling, provided to individuals with disabilities. Educational rehabilitation services are provided by teachers with professional certificates. Some teachers specialize in working with children and adults with visual impairment, hearing impairment, physical and health impairment, intellectual disabilities, or multiple handicaps and so on. To qualify for educational rehabilitation, a child or an adult must be diagnosed as having a disability and the disability must be found to adversely affect educational pursuit or activities (Mogbo, 2002) cited in (Azanr, Isola & Aiobiewe, 2015).


5.4 Vocational Rehabilitation

Vocational rehabilitation is a multi-disciplinary approach that involves a team effort of professionals in different disciplines who contribute their expertise to improve the well-being of the persons with disabilities so that they can be physically, psychologically, socially and culturally ready and competent to seek a job and to maintain a job (Crawford, 2006). Also, vocational rehabilitation has to do with the training on the job seeking skills like employability training offer for PWDs by NGOs and other civil societies in the community (Wright, 2006).


According to Onuzurike (2001), vocational training is activities which essentially aim at providing the knowledge and required skills for employment in a particular occupation or group of related occupations in any field of economic activity. There are various vocational skills that PWDs can be engaged in; they can be empowered in various trades that will enable them to contribute their quota to the society in which they live. Persons with disabilities can be trained in various vocational skills like pottery, carpentry, poultry, fishery, tailoring, leather work, tie and dye, soap making, shoe making, mechanics, home economics, and so on.


6. The Need for Sustainable Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities

The need for sustainable rehabilitation of PWDs can never be over stressed. This is because effective rehabilitation programmes focus on helping the persons with disabilities not only to adjust well but also to become gainfully employed. Okeke (2001) opined that the major justification for rehabilitation is the demand for social justice which no democratic society can deny. Every person, regardless of his/her conditions has worth, dignity and respect. Therefore, PWDs have inalienable rights to rehabilitation to enable them contribute their quota to the national development. Thus, the following reasons necessitate the need for sustainable rehabilitation programme for persons with disabilities:


6.1 Sustainable Rehabilitation Lead to Cost Reduction Benefits and Reduces Dependency Effects

As noted by Garuba (1996) cited in Aiyeleso, Onoja & Kadala (2020), the economic function of special education which includes rehabilitation can be considered from two sides of cost reduction benefits and reduced dependency effects. In this case, the training provided for PWDs reduces the cost of maintaining them in a home or institution setting. Since such persons are now trained and equipped with skills, they can maintain at least some minimal level of self-sufficiency and economic participation. This further reduces their dependency on the society and family for the provision of some of their needs. Thus, from being a consumer only, a trained person with disability becomes a producer and contributor to the economy. The second way of looking at the economic impact of sustainable rehabilitation is to consider its contributions towards increasing the quality and quantity of the nation’s resources – human and materials. Fully rehabilitated and employed PWDs will pay taxes. Those who are self-employed, in addition to paying taxes, also add to the volume of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Through sustainable rehabilitation, the untapped potentials of the PWDs are fully harnessed for the utmost benefit of the society thereby increasing the quality and quantity of manpower supply for national development.


6.2 Sustainable Rehabilitation Is A Viable Means of Equalizing Developmental Opportunities for PWDs

In the case of Nigeria, the National Development Plan, National Policy on Education emphasizes  equal opportunities for all Nigerian citizens in education, including acquisition of skills for self-employment. As Nigerian citizens, PWDs have rights to any form of education and vocational training that will enable them attain self-actualization in the interest of national development (Jackson, 2009). As Okeke (2001) rightly noted, the principle of equality of educational opportunities for all citizens imposes an unavoidable services for PWDs to enhance their physical and vocational preparedness for gainful employment and participation in the privileges and responsibilities of Nigerians as full citizens. 


6.3 Sustainable Rehabilitation Is Human Capital Development

The potentially important role of PWDs in a nation’s development cannot be overemphasized. PWDs could be the source of labor inputs as well as human capital in production, which would improve the total factor of productivity in a state of the federation where capital formation is limited. When rehabilitated and employed, PWDs could be a reliable source of demand for the economy through their productive activities. In addition, the PWDs could be useful for the national development of any country if properly rehabilitated and harnessed. Furthermore, every country has an opportunity to harness a “demographic data of PWDs for utilization and national development” (Ferrans, 2008).


7. Conclusion

The provision of sustainable rehabilitation programmes for PWDs are integrated into the ordinary process of serving every other citizen or they can be excised out of the ordinary process and channel through specialized agencies of the government or non-governmental organizations. The guiding principles for a sustainable rehabilitation programme is that PWDs shall as far as possible be equated with other groups, and have access to the same resources. This effort towards integration means that rehabilitation is incorporated in the public sector’s regular activities such as medical care, social care, education and vocational training. Meanwhile, It is very important to note that no rehabilitation process is complete until the trained PWD is physically independent, economically self-reliant and/or gainfully employed in chosen career or job.


8. Recommendations

For rehabilitation programme to be sustainable, the following recommendations should be taken into cognizance:

  1. Assessment is an educational, mental, social and psychological diagnosis done mainly for appropriate placement to a programme. Therefore, before a person with disability can be placed on an appropriate rehabilitation programme, he/she should undergo a comprehensive assessment. From the assessment, we will know the right intervention programme for sustainable rehabilitation.

  2. Support services/facilities are specialized services/facilities that help persons with disabilities to function effectively in his/her environment. Therefore, the issue of providing support services/facilities for PWDs should be addressed with all seriousness for sustainable rehabilitation. Without these essential support services/facilities, sustainability of rehabilitation programme for PWDs will be a mirage.

  3. Monitoring/supervision is the follow up and inspection of the programme during and after completed. Therefore, monitoring/supervision is necessary to assist the successfully rehabilitated persons with disabilities to gain and maintain proper adjustment on the vocational skills and/or  the job.


Read more about the “Approaches to Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities 👇

https://disabilitymatter.blogspot.com/2022/02/approaches-to-rehabilitation-of-persons.html?m=1


References

Aiyeleso, M.M., Ojo, O.P. & Kadala, U.I. (2020). “Sustainable Rehabilitation of Persons Hearing Impairment”, in Adaka, T.A m. (ed.) Sustainable Development for Children with Special Needs. Makurdi: Nats Printing and Publishing.


Azanr, F. O., Isola, S. A. & Aiobiewe, T. A. (eds.) (2025). Essentials for special needs education: A practical guide for teachers. Lagos: Pee & gree press and Publishers.


Crawford, G. O. (2006). Introduction to vocational rehabilitation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.


Davis, S. (2006). Rehabilitation: The Use of Theories and Models in Practice. New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.


Ferrans, C. Z. (2008). Conceptual model of health-related rehabilitation for quality of life. New York:  Tau Int Honor.


Hale, S. & Cowls, P. (2009). Disability and rehabilitation: some questions of definition. In Amedia and C. Cox (eds.) The sociology of medical practice. London: Coller Macmillan.


Jackson, H. (2009). Approach to rehabilitations: A review. Journal of Social Development in Africa. 3(1), pp. 39 – 53.


Okeke, B. A. (2001). Essentials of Special Education. Nsukka: Afro-Orbis Publishing Company Ltd.


Onuzurike, J.O. (2001). Dictionary for the non-professionals. Jos: Deka Printers.


Stilwell, P. H. (2010). Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: Wishington DC: Clin Rehabil 


Thomas, M. S. (2002). Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: a search for appropriate indicators. London:  Int J Rehabil Res Int.


Tuggar, A.M. (2016). “Types of Services for Persons with Special Needs”. National Journal of Special Needs Education (NJSNE), Volume 2 Number II and III (December, 2016). Pp. 16 – 19.


UN, (2008). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Geneva: UN Press.


Walker A. J. (2005). Cognitive rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A pilot programme of goal planning and outdoor adventure course participation. Berlin: Fbrain Inj.


WHO, (1980). "Rehabilitation For All", in World Health Magazine, May 1984, WHO, Geneva: WHO Press.


Wright, B. A. (2006). Physical disability: A psychological approach. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.






Friday, February 25, 2022

APPROACHES TO REHABILITATION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

      

Abstract

The numbers of persons with disabilities (PWDs) worldwide, and particularly in the developing countries, are increasing due to wars, conflicts, vehicular accidents, chronic diseases, mental impairment, birth defects and malnutrition. Many of these PWDs face participation-restriction in activities of life. Thus, rehabilitation seeks to remove or reduce the handicapping effects of disability and lead to an improvement in the quality of life of the PWDs. Therefore, This paper reviews the institutional-based rehabilitation (IBR) and community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approaches for rehabilitation. Other areas entail in the paper are conceptual definitions of rehabilitation and persons with disabilities. The paper ends with a conclusion as well.


Keywords: Persons with Disabilities (PWDs), Institutional-Based Rehabilitation (IBR), Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR).


Introduction

There are different responses to the issues associated with disabilities. Clearly, eliminating discrimination, segregation and negative attitudes are necessary responses. But in developing countries particularly, the notions of prevention and rehabilitation are seen as vitally important because so many impairments can be avoided. Many have dichotomized between prevention and rehabilitation as two mutually exclusive techniques, with rehabilitation being a second-rate alternative. Certainly, prevention is the most desirable attack against many disabling conditions, such as polio, which can be combated by vaccination; or cerebral palsy, which is often caused by poor pre- and post-natal care. Disability specialists have asserted that up to 50% of some types of disabilities could be prevented by immunizations, environmental improvements and better overall health care (Lambo and Sartorius, 2013). Many diseases and conditions that result in disabilities cannot be easily prevented and many cannot be prevented at all, no matter how developed a country is or how comprehensive its preventative health-care system.


The focus of rehabilitation on the individual rather than on the wider community and the physical environment has major implications. Because it helps to keep the problems hidden from the public eye, so that policy makers, planners, politicians and others are less likely to take the needs of persons with disabilities into account. Because the problem is seen to lie within the individual and in her/his limitations, the solution must also logically be sought at this level, that is, in individual adjustment, rather than in environmental accommodation or modification. Therefore, the institution-based rehabilitation (IBR) approach of persons with disabilities has emphasized segregated institutional care, and has largely neglected the need both to integrate persons with disabilities into their wider community, and for community attitudes themselves to be rehabilitated or changed to facilitate this integration. Alternatively, the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approach is conceived as a strategy within community development for the rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, and social integration of all persons with disabilities. CBR is implemented through the combined efforts of persons with disabilities themselves, their families and communities, and the appropriate health, education, vocational and social services (Tompett, 2009).


Persons with Disabilities (PWDs)

Disability is an umbrella term for impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, denoting the negative aspects of the interaction between an individual (with a health condition) and that individual’s contextual factors (environmental and personal factors) (WHO, 2011). Persons with disabilities (PWDs) therefore include those who have long-term physical, mental, psycho-social, intellectual or sensory impairments resulting from any physical or mental health conditions which in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others (UN, 2008). 


People with disabilities throughout the world experience discrimination and segregation. Although in more developed countries the disability community has been championing accessibility and appropriate community supports, people with disabilities in less developed countries often have little access to any services or supports at all (Mia, 1983). 


The overall prevalence of persons with disabilities across the world has been estimated at nearly 500 million persons, approximately 75% of them residing in the developing world (Lundgren &  Nordholm, 2018). The exact number of persons with disabilities in the developing world is hard to ascertain, due both to difficulties in estimation and to the notion that disability itself is a social construct that is difficult to define. Nevertheless, the rate of disability has both placed great financial strains on the health-care systems of developing countries and has created a large class of non-working populations. 


Poor overall health conditions, poverty and malnutrition, chronic diseases, wars and conflicts as well as accidents are major factors in causing the higher rates of disability in less developed countries. The most common causes of childhood disability in these countries are malnutrition of pregnant mother and child (resulting in iodine deficiency), injuries before and during birth, exposure to toxic substances and infectious diseases (Hammerman, 2015). These factors, many of which can be avoided, result in a large number of children being afflicted with paralysis, stunted growth, deafness, blindness, epilepsy and learning disabilities among others (Lambo & Sartorius, 2013).


Concept of Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation is not only concerned with physical or functional restoration/compensation of persons with disabilities by injury or disease. Attention is also given to the total quality of life in terms of wellness, happiness and satisfaction in fulfilling the demands, needs, and capacities of human existence in orientation, freedom of movement, independence, expression of self (with respect to age, sex and culture), relationship and ability to ensure independent economic existence. After a serious injury, illness or surgery, one needs to recover slowly. There is the need to regain strength, to relearn skills or find new ways of doing things one did before. This is the process of rehabilitation (Mock, 2003).


Children who are born with disabilities need stimulation for development and adaptation – habilitation (Winnick, 2007), and those who acquire disabilities also need rehabilitation. Technically, therefore, rehabilitation is a creative procedure that includes the cooperative efforts of various medical specialists, and associates in other health, technical and environmental fields, to improve the physical, mental, social and vocational aptitudes of the PWDs, with the objectives of preserving and improving their ability to live happily and productively on the same level, and with the same opportunities as their neighbors (Olaogun, 2010). In other words, it is a process of decreasing the dependence of the person with disability, by developing to the greatest extent possible, the abilities needed for adequate functioning in his individual situation in the community (Goffman, 2004). 


Rehabilitation is defined by WHO as ‘all measures aimed at reducing the impact of disability and handicapping conditions, and at enabling the disabled and the handicapped to achieve social integration’ (Lundgren & Nordholm, 2018). Rehabilitation is thus suited for two circumstances: first, for situations when some sort of physical or mental impairment exists, but is amenable to treatment to improve or prevent a further condition; second, if a person has a condition that cannot be improved, but could become more independent through special assistance that builds on their abilities. 


Rehabilitation of persons with disabilities may be summarized as meaning to integrate or re-integrate physically, sensorially, mentally and/or psychologically persons with disabilities into as full and as normal life roles as is possible. Rehabilitation in its fullest sense necessitates, on the one hand, maximizing the physical and mental fitness of individuals and their capacity to work and to enjoy life, through interventions ranging from the medical and paramedical to counseling and vocational training and job placement; and, on the other hand, promoting the accessibility and openness of the physical and social environment to persons with disabilities (Oliver, 2001).


Institutional-Based Rehabilitation (IBR)

Institutional-based rehabilitation services are segregated institutional care, which include medical and vocational rehabilitation centers, residential homes, special schools with therapy and nursing care, sheltered workshops and day centers, to name the most salient, have formed the backbone of rehabilitation services in developed countries, supported to differing degrees by financial and material benefits, counseling and other support services in the community. However, for PWDs living at home, and for their families and friends living or working with them, access to support services may vary enormously. Many people, particularly those severely mentally handicapped, remain in long term residential care despite mounting evidence of the inadequacies of many such institutions (Bose, 2003). 

 

While this conception of rehabilitation can be appropriate in many circumstances, many less developed countries, following the lead of more developed countries, have adopted an institutional model of rehabilitation (Marincek, 2008). The institutional model relies on professionally trained specialists who use state-of-the art equipment to provide intensive rehabilitation to people with disabilities. Treatment is provided in institutions, usually located in major urban areas (Malafatopoulos, 2006). As health and rehabilitation are viewed in the institution-based model as a medical problem rather than also as a social problem, rehabilitation is treated as simply a medical service (WHO, 1986). 


However, an institution-based rehabilitation program may not be suitable for many developing countries for several reasons. First, these institutions are enormously expensive, requiring large capital outlays for sophisticated equipment, facilities and professional staff. Most people with disabilities, who are often the poorest of the poor, are not able to afford this expensive institutional care, and thus have no access to its services (Malafatopoulos, 2006). Second, these institutions are almost always located in the cities, away from the rural population (Mia, 2016). Third, the high-tech equipment used in these rehabilitation institutions is expensive, and requires highly trained specialists to run it (Finkenflugel, 2011). Thus, developing countries must trade a large amount of scarce resources for equipment, personnel, spare parts and training in order to serve only a small proportion of their population (Mia, 2016). Furthermore, the Western concern about the segregation caused by institution-based services is also a valid concern in less developed countries. The institutional method of providing services to people with disabilities is contraindicated for many situations.


In this category, general or specialized services are offered in an institution or home for the PWDs. General institutions include centers that provide services for people with all types of disability. Specialized ones include homes for children with physical disability, e.g., Atanda Olu School, Surulere, Lagos and Cheshire Home Oluyole, Ibadan, all in Nigeria. Rehabilitation Centre, Moniya, Ibadan, is also an institution-based rehabilitation center, with active rehabilitation services and vocational training for spinal cord injury victims. The institute also provides out-patient and in-patient services, and long-term boarding. An example of this is Modupe Cole Home for the Handicap, Akoka, Lagos. There are regular physiotherapy services for the cerebral palsy children in this home (Dube, 2005).


Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR)

The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed the Community-based Rehabilitation model (CBR) as an appropriate model for developing countries to provide basic rehabilitation services to its citizens. The CBR model, derived from WHO’s Primary Health Care model (PHC), promotes the use of community resources and personnel to provide basic rehabilitation services in a low-cost, yet highly accessible manner. CBR is currently being adopted rapidly by both less and more developed countries (Lightfoot, 2016). 


An alternative approach to Institutional Based Rehabilitation (IBR) is Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) which has the notion that:

  1. If rehabilitation is to reach all those in need in the developing countries, there must be a large-scale transfer of knowledge about disabilities and skills in the rehabilitation of people with disabilities to their families and members of the community.

  2. For rehabilitation to be successful, communities must recognize and accept that people with disabilities have the same rights as other human beings. Rehabilitation therefore needs to aim at bringing about this required attitude- change in communities. It has been found that this change in attitude is most effectively brought about when communities themselves take on the task of rehabilitating their members who have disabilities. CBR is a strategy that seeks to ensure that people with disabilities are involved in the development of their community by having equal access to rehabilitation and other services and opportunities – health, education and income; as do other members of the society (Lightfoot, 2016).

The targets of the CBR programme are: people with disabilities, families of people with disabilities, organizations of people with disabilities, local, regional (state) and national (federal) governments, international organizations, non-governmental organizations, professionals in health sciences and other fields and the private sector (business and industry). Likewise, the system components of the CBR include: technology, service delivery and community involvement and close cooperation with organizations of people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities (Marincek, 2008).

 

The rehabilitation places the primary focus on community care or family care, with institutions playing a support role rather than being the main rehabilitation resource. Community based rehabilitation has been promoted for several years by the WHO, UNICEF, the ILO and other international organizations, and it is gaining increasing acceptance by governments and NGOs in many developing countries. The WHO (1986) suggests that specialist rehabilitation institutions should be used for complex medical and paramedical services for acute and special needs; for research; training; workshops for more complicated aids and appliances; coordination and planning; and bases for mobile units such as eye units, amongst other possible functions. They should be the last possible stage in a referral chain starting with families and village health workers. (or equivalent), and the first stage for referral after acute, and severe injury. The aim of Rehabilitation institutions should be short term intensive care rather than long term, except in some extreme cases, and their specialist services should genuinely be available to those most in need of them.      

         

   Source:  WHO  (1986)

 

The WHO concentrates mainly on the medical and paramedical aspects of rehabilitation, but a move away from institutional segregation is both possible and desirable for education and vocational rehabilitation as well. Children with disabilities can attend normal schools in the community, if they can get access to them - this means both transport to reach the school and accessible buildings. For those with special learning needs, the sensorially or mentally impaired, especially classes may be needed in some subjects, but integration in others may be feasible. Teachers in ordinary schools can be given extra training in block or day release to cope with the needs of  children with disabilities; specially trained teachers can visit normal schools; simple aids can be developed to overcome a variety of problems. A problem-solving strategy can be adopted, with the central focus of maximizing the integration of children with different disabilities into as normal an educational environment as possible, and with the aim of maximizing their abilities and opportunity for normal development (Freire, 2008).


Community based rehabilitation can potentially encompass the whole range of rehabilitation services with greater success than the expensive, segregationist strategy of institutional care. The main advantages of such an approach may be summarized as follows:

  1. it is much cheaper than institutional care, and therefore has the potential to reach all PWDs, not just a select few;

  2. it avoids dislocating people from their communities, and the risks of institutionalization, psychological scarring, and the creation of dependence;

  3. it trains people to cope directly with the environment in which they will live, using resources that are largely available locally;

  4. it improves detection and referral, greatly reduces problems of transport and access, allows easy supervision and follow up, and continued support for the whole family;

  5. it can ensure that PWDs learn useful skills that are directly applicable in their environment, thus promoting their self-sufficiency and also their capacity to contribute directly to their own society;

  6. it promotes community and rural development by creating jobs: rehabilitation workers can be drawn from the local community, many simple aids and appliances can be produced locally using local materials and skills as far as possible, and PWDs themselves may be trained to work for the rehabilitation of others;

  7. by a keeping PWDs in the community it enhances family and community understanding and acceptance of PWDs, and an understanding of the causes and treatment of impairments. This will lead to better prevention of impairments, earlier detection and treatment of potentially disabling conditions, and lessened ostracism and social handicapping of impaired individuals;

  8. it leaves rehabilitation institutions free to concentrate on acute and severe disability or special needs requiring highly technical intervention, and on research, development, training and other functions that make rational use of specialized and scarce resources (Abdi, 2003).

Thus a well developed community based rehabilitation strategy can be seen to have major benefits for people with disabilities, for their families and for the community itself. For governments with a commitment

to the welfare and development of their people this approach provides the possibility of effective rehabilitation for all without the crippling expenditure of institutional care (Tinney, 2007).


Conclusion

It would seem that some form of community based or community orientated

rehabilitation is the only feasible strategy to attempt to meet both the immediate physical needs of persons with disabilities, and the long term goal of community conscientisation about health care, prevention of impairments, rehabilitation of the PWDs and their full acceptance into the community. Centralized institutional care fails to educate the community, and imposes further psychological stress and isolation on already stressed people, whilst rehabilitating them to cope with an environment different from their own. In the wider context, community based rehabilitation can be seen as part of the general aim of rural development, whereby resources of cash, materials, services, jobs, and, crucially, human potential are promoted in the rural areas. For people with disabilities it offers the possibility of real integration, and not the segregated rehabilitation of the institution. Different countries need a strategy appropriate to their particular constraints and demands, and one that can be developed with flexibility to meet their particular needs in ways that are culturally acceptable and practically and economically feasible. 


It is to be hoped that more developing countries will experiment with and expand community rehabilitation services, and incorporate this type of strategy as the cornerstone of national policies on rehabilitation. The potential benefits extend far beyond the immediate needs of PWDs, into the enrichment and development of the general community itself, and can be identified as incorporating both humanitarian and economic considerations.


References

Abdi, O. A. (2003). Disability in Somaliland. Disability and Society 18(7), pp.911- 920.


Bose, A. (2003). "The Community Health Worker Scheme: An Indian Experiment" in Practising Health for All, Morley et al. (eds).  London: Oxford Press.


Dube, P. N. (2005). Perceived Barriers to Employment Among Trained Physically Disabled People. BSW Dissertation, School of Social Work, Harare. 


Finkenflugel, H. (2011). ‘Help for the Disabled – in Hospital and at Home’, World Health Forum 12: 325–30.


Freire, P. (2008). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Penguin Books, Middlesex.


Goffman, E. (2004). National Disability Policy Document. Retrieved from http://www.disability.dk/site/viewdoc.php?doc_id=208&se ction_id=6. On 18/12/2021


Hammerman, S. (2015). ‘Disabled People in the Third World: The Silent Emergency’, in D. Warms (ed.) Into the 21st Century: Selected Papers from the UCP Inter-national Conference on The Changing Rehabilitation World, pp. 103–8. New York: United Cerebral Palsy of New York City.


Lambo, T. & Sartorius, N. (2013). ‘Mental Health Programs: An International Perspective’, in T. Lambo and S. Day (eds) Issues in Contemporary International Health. New York: Plenum Medical Book Company.


Lightfoot, E. (2016). Community-based rehabilitation: A rapidly growing method for supporting people with disabilities. International Social Work, 47(4):455–468.


Lundgren, B. & Nordholm, L. (2018). ‘Community-based Rehabilitation – A Survey of Disabled in a Village in Botswana’, Disability and Rehabilitation 15(2):83–9.


Malafatopoulos, S. (2006). ‘Rehabilitation in the Third World’, in D. Warms (ed.) Into the 21st Century: Selected Papers from the UCP International Conference on The Changing Rehabilitation World, pp. 100–2. New York: United Cerebral Palsy Foundation.


Marincek, R. (2008). ‘Community-based Rehabilitation – the Challenge and Opportunity. International Disability Studies 10: 87–8.


Mia, A. (2016). ‘Community Participation: The Needed Approach to Primary and Secondary Prevention of Disability and Rehabilitation of the Disabled in Rural Communities’. International Social Work 26: 26–34.


Mock, C. S. (2003). Long-term injury related disability in Ghana. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25 (13), pp.732-741. New York City.


Olaogun, M. Z. (2010). The Oyo State Community Physiotherapy Scheme: Preventive and promotive measure in Nigeria. Physiotherapy Practice 2, pp.174-176


Oliver, M. (2001). Social Work with Disabled People. London: BASW, Macmillan.


Tinney, W. J. (2007). Medical rehabilitation in Ghana. Disability & Rehabilitation 29(11), pp.921-927.


Tompett, J. (2009). CBR in Nassarawa State: Presentation at the 47th Annual Conference of the Nigeria Society of Physiotherapy. Mallam Amino Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano.


UN (2008). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Geneva: UN Press.


WHO (1986). "Rehabilitation For All", in World Health Magazine, May 1984, WHO, Geneva: WHO Press.


WHO (2011). World Report on Disability, Chapter 4: Rehabilitation, 2011, p. 96–133.


Winneick, D. (2007). Disabled Village Children: A Guide to Community Health Workers, Rehabilitation Workers, and Families. Palo Alto, CA: Hesperian Foundation.